Nokia 3.1 A

  • Released 2019, June
    156g, 9.4mm thickness
    Android 9.0
    32GB storage, microSD slot
  • 0.5% 138,174 hits
  • 15 Become a fan
  • 5.45"
    720x1440 pixels
  • 8MP
    1080p
  • 2GB RAM
    Snapdragon 429
  • 2990mAh
    Li-Ion

Nokia 3.1 A - Specs

Network Technology GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G bands GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands HSDPA (unspecified)
4G bands LTE (unspecified)
Speed HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
GPRS Yes
EDGE Yes
Launch Announced 2019, June
Status Available. Released 2019, June
Body Dimensions 152.7 x 71.9 x 9.4 mm (6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 in)
Weight 156 g (5.50 oz)
SIM Nano-SIM
Display Type IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Size 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~69.8% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density)
Platform OS Android 9.0 (Pie)
Chipset Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429
CPU Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53
GPU Adreno 504
Memory Card slot microSD, up to 128 GB
Internal 32GB 2GB RAM
Main Camera Single 8 MP, f/2.0, AF
Features LED flash, HDR, panorama
Video 1080p@30fps
Selfie camera Single 5 MP, f/2.2
Features HDR
Video 720p@30fps
Sound Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack Yes
Comms WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE
GPS Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS
Radio FM radio
USB 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector
Features Sensors Accelerometer, gyro, proximity
Battery   Non-removable Li-Ion 2990 mAh battery
Charging Battery charging 10W
Misc Colors Black
Models TA1140

Nokia 3.1 A - User Reviews

  • This is a budget phone for under a hundred bucks, it's the same as the C version hardware wise, this one being locked to att. To compare this model to the 3.1, it has more internal storage, usb-c, micro SD and a plastic body with no fingerprint reader. In my opinion this is a big upgrade from the international version. The battery life is surprisingly decent, two days with lots of talk time, using maps and web browsing. The screen is usable in bright sunlight and I've found that the camera takes decent photos, and the phone itself is fairly responive despite the weak soc and low memory. Last but not least this device has a plastic body, I've found that call quality and cell reception is better than the more expensive 6.1. If you're looking for a budget phone for some web browsing, texting, and calling, this is for you, otherwise you're in the wrong price range. On a side note, finding a case for this phone is still difficult and your options are limited.

  • The user AI is horrible, keyboard horrible no back button makes switching between apps impossible. Other than that... Good for the price

  • For the price it's pretty good. C'mon you can't complain, it's basically a budget phone under $90 and you get a lot for what it's worth. This isn't a phone marketed for high end users. I tried one in store and it took great looking pics and seem pretty fast. If I needed something at this price range I would jump on it.

  • Bad device due to little battery

  • Very difficult to find any kind of a case for this phone.

  • $89 at Walmart, I think it's worth it.

  • Weird that Nokia 2.2 have bigger screen but 6mm shorter on dimenson plus seem to have even better options as Helio A22 with 3GB ram. Pretty much same size battery too. To who is this 3.1 A and C for ? With this old hardware it has there is no hope on android updates too. Maybe it get Q but even that is too much of a hope.

  • You must launch this phone 4 year ago, not now.

  • international version of 3.1 is much better than this

  • Because this is not Nokia

  • Maybe waiting to perform well remember thé Nokia 9 purezoom Idea was great result ...wasnt what they excepted Old gen cpu Rendering too slow etc... They maybe wait for 865 Sp + 12 GB + 4500mah + 6.3 + triple cam (48+12+12) + 3.5mm jack Price 800$ here they gonna hurt really Much Dreams are good XD

  • The 3.2 is better, the 3.1 i of the previous generation of Nokia Androids.

  • Jesus this is worse than Nokia 2.2

  • Why Nokia don't do high end phone with Zeiss camera same golden age of Nokia N80 and Communicator and E90, or Lumia - windows phone ?